NoCarolinaTony Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thats good, but I won\'t change my play because
> lets say.....Jean Luc Samyn ended up on what I
> thought was best play or value play.
This has nothing to do with my point.
>Jockies mean more at low level tracks than on the major
> circuits. It\'s a very small factor in how I play
> the race.
Never said it was a major factor. But there are jock/trainer cobinations that are solid. When a move is made, its foolish not to take notice.
>
> I doubt that Horse on Saturday pays $188 if lets
> say Gomez ended up on that runner.
No kidding?? I guess next thing you\'ll tell me is water is wet??
> You make you\'re best scores with second tier jocks
> most times......
>
> NCT
Debatable. But again, thats not the point. Its real simple Tony. A trainer employing a certain jockey can often times signal intent. That was the only point of the post. Thats it. If you think that a horse getting a new jockey that hits at a 38% win rate for the trainer means nothing....then please play in my pools. Its guys that ignore these moves that helps inflate the price.