BB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wow! Now THAT\'S a VP of communications!
>
> Would love to get a hold of that survey.
\" \'In five words, our core fans are pissed,\" Chamblin said. \"They are very
upset with us, and the intensity of their responses is very alarming to
say the least.\'\"
\"From July 2-10 of this year, interviews were conducted with about 1,200 sports
fans, 600 core racing fans and 180 industry participants.The objective of the
study, Chamblin said, was to measure the overall health of the sport.\"
[At this point I must interject and say that is like sticking a
thermometer under a corpse\'s tongue].
\"Core fans are most concerned with the use of drugs in racehorses, while casual
fans focus on equine health and safety. On both counts, perceptions are
negative.\"
Yes, BB I would also like to see the Survey, which was conducted by SocialSphere
Strategies, according to the article. I would like to see the exact wording of
the questions and I would like to know the exact demographics of the \"core\" and
the \"casual\".
Without seeing the Survey and the above mentioned components of the Survey,
I respectfully retain my right to be extremely skeptical of the results of said
Survey.
Because it would seem all to easy to create an Agenda, and then to create
a \"Survey\" in support of said Agenda. What questions were asked,and to whom? To
cite a Survey such as this, without disclosing its parameters and results in
toto, leads a skeptical mind such as mine to question the results of the
Survey.
My personal pet peeve is the dilution of the quality of Racing in the US. I
think that if there was a central body in control of Racing and Breeding we
would have a sounder more formful breed and the excess use of drugs would not
be necessary and there would be fewer catastrophic breakdowns.
I think many serious horseplayers, if asked the questions properly, would list
other issues above drugs and equine health, such as takeout and taxation issues,
rebate availability, the condition of live racing and simulcast facilities and
the treatment of customers at these facilities,transparency concerns and the
unrestricted ability to watch and wager on Racing while at home. And certainly
all of the above mentioned issues would be easier to resolve if there was a
central sanctioning body for Racing.
Certainly the \"Whales\", who may or may not be keeping Racing afloat (and will
have more of a role in keeping Racing going if the \"casual player\" (plankton?)
suddenly dissapears or limits his/her involvement due to an uncertain economy)
would list almost all of the issues mentioned in the above paragraph before
drug/health concerns.
To mix a well known literary reference and an awful pun, \"Whales weep not.\"
The breakdown of Eight Belles was tragic and didn\'t have to happen, but the
breakdowns of Pine Island and Barbaro and Go For Wand and a $2500 claimer at
Fairmount or River Downs were/are no less tragic and yet the game continues.
The drug and equine health problem is much more manageable than some of the
other issues listed above: Define the rules, enforce the rules, punish the
rule breakers severely.