HP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes good riddance. Every bit of \"buzz\" generated
> by Big Brown was negative after the Belmont
> debacle. Plus all of the negative buzz does not
> really put his Derby and Preakness efforts in a
> good light (steroid aided, as everyone asks?).
>
> Before the Belmont - Superhorse. After the
> Belmont - after being put on the spot, they pull
> the \'roids and he can\'t run back to his previous
> efforts. I will not miss him, his owner(s), or
> his trainer one bit.
Geez, you guys act as if he\'s the only horse to have ever used steroids. Guess what, when you win the first 2 legs of the Triple crown you get more attention than those that didn\'t.
Every bit of buzz was not negative. And when BC day rolls around, and you won\'t get to see him face off against Curlin, tell me how much you don\'t miss him. Yeah sure. Continue to root and watch other horses that use steroids, have owners that are jerks, have trainers that bull---t you, and all the other things that you accuse this horse and connections of. I\'m not a fan of the connections either, but to say Big Brown missing the BC is a good thing is beyond ridiculous.
You can lie to us, just don\'t lie to yourself.