Author Topic: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds  (Read 1315 times)

JimP

  • Posts: 419
    • View Profile
Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
« on: February 07, 2003, 01:19:34 PM »
Someone who has the numbers should start an attrition list. Post all the 3-year-olds that ran a sub 6 last year. And then check them off one-by-one as they fall by the wayside.

Phalaris

  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2003, 01:39:37 PM »
If someone does this, humor me and note the distance at which this figure was accomplished.


bdhsheets

  • Posts: 277
    • View Profile
Re: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2003, 01:02:54 AM »
You might get your wish...........

May they all come home safely!

supey

  • Guest
Re: super (like me) 6 2-Year-Olds
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2003, 04:13:14 AM »
could you please do the same w/a random sampling of 2 yo\'s in the 8-10 range, as well as the 12-14 range?

also, I\'d like those 3 categories broken down by # of starts.bdhsheets wrote:

supey

  • Guest
Re: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2003, 02:41:20 PM »
just wanted to repost this at the top, in case anybody missed it, as it actually involves horses.

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: Sub 6 2-Year-Olds
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2003, 03:07:22 PM »
Actually, I\'m glad you did, and not just because you are proving my point about Ragozin guys.
Listen, you are obviously profoundly smart, and have given it a lot of thought, and know you are using the best figures. So, educate us-- having read Friedman\'s post, explain how they came up with the Chilukki figure.
Or, just make another wisecrack, which we will take to mean you have no answer...

TGJB