Jerry,
Before the Derby you made mention that the Churchill stewards brought all the trainers in for a meeting on testing. You said one of the trainers became visibly frustrated and was asking a lot of questions.
Earlier this week, you found Friesan Fire\'s quick recovery from some cuts and grabbed quarter and fast workout to be \"interesting\" (not your word, mine). You further stated that Pimlico is using a different lab for testing and were equally curious as to who or why.
So, here it comes: 1) Was it Jones that became visibly frustrated in Kentucky, 2) do you think he\'s \"using\", 3) would you bet FF this weekend to run well?
I know you\'re not the type to kiss and tell and I recognize I\'m asking you to do so. Your thoughts or comments on the issue though would be important not only to those that value your opinion but also in the sense that, IF TRUE REGARDING ANY TRAINER, we as the racing public should be able to make enough noise either though Congress or other channels to have things investigated.
For the record, I had FF in the Derby and will likely bet him again in the Preakness.
Thanks Jerry.