Covelj/Jim,
You are right, you certainly cashed on the Preakness. And I will tell you what, based on some of your bets, I make you a 1-5 favorite to cash a higher percentage of tickets than I do. Without a doubt!! My guess is though, that as you use TG figures for longer, you will change/adapt your betting style. Using premium data to ferret out 3-5 and 2-1 type plays is not a good value proposition. I will plagiarize Julian from one of the Saratoga Thorograph seminars a couple years back. He says \"I am not smart enough to play favorites. I need a MUCH bigger margin of error, because I am wrong too often, in a tough tough game\". Now, Julian is probably an extreme as he won\'t get out of his chair for less than 30-1, but you get the drift.
I think a lot of folks are coming to judgment too soon on Dunkirk getting the distance. He ran into a TOP CLASS colt in Quality Road in that Florida Derby, one who would have dusted the Derby field IMO. He made a huge move on a somewhat speed favoring trip, then watched as Quality Road \"re-broke\" in the stretch. I don\'t think the 1 1/8 beat him that day. I think he ran into a faster horse. Unless Rachel runs, there are no Quality Roads in the Belmont. Nobody even remotely close IMO. Not sure what happened to Dunkirk in the Derby other than getting squeezed at the start, but he ran so bad I am inclinded to just call it an \"x\" and move on. I don\'t know how I can point to the Derby as a sign of his distance limitations. You can point to the Derby and say he is \"off form\" if you like, but I don\'t think it is a sign of distance limitations. Now he gets 5 weeks into the Belmont and for all Pletcher\'s failures in the Derby he did get a filly to beat Curlin in the Belmont off the same 5 weeks rest. And the Belmont is frankly a race that Curlin should have run well in, as it plays to the horses that can cruise and gallup at high speeds and then stay on. Dunkirk, with his paired \"0\'s\" has two figures in the range of Charitable Man\'s one figure top. Granted, I think Charitable Man can run a new top and Dunkirk is more likely to pair, but nonetheless it is hard to have a real strong opinion on CM and be negative on Dunkirk. Yes, Mine that Bird has two figures that contend as well, but is on his 3rd race in 5 weeks and I think his style is a negative for this Belmont. Barring Rachel running, this figures to be a controlled pace, with MTB sitting quite a bit back, making his run. I think CM controls that pace and spurts away at the top of the stretch, with Dunkirk being a bit more tactical than MTB and able to stay close enough to mount some kind of move.
Now, if Rachel runs, I might switch to Dunkirk on top, because Charitable Man will be the one to pressure Rachel and DUnkirk will get the better trip.
Not to mention what could be a great undercard on Belmont day, with an all stakes pick 6.