ALM-- we have reason to believe CM does not like poly because his race over it was worse than all his dirt races. but even if he does like it and just ran badly because he was short, we compare the top to his 2yo top, as others have said here. Which doesn\'t mean he can\'t bounce, but makes it a whole lot less likely than if he had a 6 top at two, and 6-0 on dirt this year.
MTB-- if he didn\'t have the first 2 dirt figures this year I would say he probably just didn\'t like synth. But he didn\'t immediately run big figures, he developed into them. As I said, it\'s probably 50/50 that he has another in him. I said after the Derby that he was the kind that could put in 3 big ones, because he didn\'t have big ones BEFORE the Derby, which most do. That gives him a better chance of running well than most off two big TC efforts, but it\'s still his third start in 5 weeks, 2 big efforts, lots of development.
SB-- I agree about the blinkers, I don\'t like new random factors with horses that have been running well. But price is a factor here.
Zito-- he clearly points horses for the Belmont, and they have fired off some awful looking lines, and more importantly, run new tops. I don\'t remember any Lukas horses running new tops in the Belmont, but I didn\'t go back and look. I did with Zito. And it makes it hard to throw his horses out just because their patterns are weak. That doesn\'t mean I\'m going to key them or play them heavy, but I\'m going to use them in exotics. Lukas too, underneath.
If you make MTB 100% to run well, he\'s still no better than 2-1 to win the race, just because there are two other horses with similar number power, and others that could run new tops, bad trip possibilities for all aside. Since nobody is ever 100% to run well, he has to be an underlay.