Dana,
Fair comments regarding the surface. Hopefully we\'ll get to see just how well Z would stack up against horses far superior to anything Rachel has raced against.
Silver,
My long time sparring partner. You can\'t tell me that winning the BC Classic wouldn\'t put her squarely in the picture. Stack a winning Classic performance against what Rachel has done, and that includes factoring in WHO she beat (which I have already talked about) and you do have a justifiable argument for Z. The older males she beat are nice horses but far less compared to the Classic field, the 3YO males she beat in the Preakness have come back to do nothing, and the Haskell was over a speed favoring sloppy track. Yes its admirable, but I don\'t know why some of you just dismiss the Classic as vitrually non-existant.
Michael D,
Winning BC performances have vaulted many horses to HOY (You obviously know this, not being insulting here). She\'s also won other races this year, they do count. Add the Classic, against a world wide field, thats got to count for something. Thanks for seeing my point of view, and I look forward to your BC thoughts as the day gets closer.
Rick,
I would need at least 5/1, and I wouldn\'t get it. She\'ll be no more than 3/1.
Mike,
A bit of a WC bias?? Sure, but its not blind. I think my points are valid. Agree with your thoughts regarding IF Z wins the Classic. Regarding figures, you make a great point about figs on synthetics compared to dirt. Lets see what happens in the Classic before we dismiss Z as not having beaten \"faster\" colts.
Thank you all for your thoughts. Whatever you think about the HOY debate or which race Z should run in, it makes for interesting discussion. And since we can\'t change the fact the BC is being run over synthetics again. lets enjoy the anticipation of the BC and relish seeing horses from all over the world compete. Just got my tickets in the mail yesterday and can\'t wait to get there.