the problem is that NP\'s hasn\'t been 9f yet. He got caught going 1 1/16th last time (albeit by a very nice horse) and that\'s as far as he has been.
I have owned enough sprinters that can get 1 1/16th that can\'t go 1 1/8th (let alone 1 1/4) to know that each 1/16th of a mile makes a huge difference when you have a sprinter\'s pedigree.
Now, if you have a ton of stamina on the bottom-side of a pedigree, we have to be more open minded to a horse outrunning the sire statistics. Certainly this was the case with Big Brown and when I look at this year\'s crop with Odysseus who although by Malibu Moon, has a ton of stamina influence on the bottom side, including Belmont Winner CONQUISTADOR CIELO and Nijinksy and Round Table. So, I am alot more open minded to a horse with a sprint sire \"outrunning his pedigree\" when I have this kind of bottom side as oppossed to NP\'s dam sire of Clever Trick. Now NP does have Proud Trusth and Nijinsky two and three back respectively on the bottom side so that at least can let someone dream about the 1 1/4 but as MJ has said, the way this horse got caught going 1 1/16th in his previous races seems to be more evidence that he doesn\'t want to go the extra few panels.
At least we will get another datapoint when he tries 9f in the Arkansas Derby.
All great debate, if nothing else, this back and forth has forced me to do some of the bottom-side pedigree analysis that I would normally put off till derby week.