« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Rachel Case, Round One  (Read 1103 times)

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Rachel Case, Round One
« on: April 12, 2010, 05:10:01 PM »
The judge found that Lauffer owes us, but decided to base the amount on what is \"typical\" in the industry, rather than what I charge (which was testified to by four people), which means flat 5% of purchase price rather than our performance based fees.

Appeal to follow.
Logged
TGJB

mjellish

  • Posts: 901
    • View Profile
Re: Rachel Case, Round One
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2010, 06:01:22 PM »
Well, at least he owes you.  Congrats on that part.
Logged

P-Dub

  • Posts: 2903
    • View Profile
Re: Rachel Case, Round One
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2010, 03:45:59 AM »
JB,

Sounds like quite a bit of money not coming your way...at least for now. Good luck with the appeal.

Why would he award what is \"typical\", when your proprietary information and knowledge is what allows you to make shrewd investments for your clients?? Not to mention, this guy sounds like a real piece of work.
Logged
P-Dub
Pages: [1]
« previous next »