BitPlayer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nice call Michael D. How did you come up with
> Persistently?
Thanks Bit. The horse most likely to get the distance.
I really didn\'t like the Del Handicap. After setting those ridiculous fractions, LAT should have been able to cruise home in :24. She finished that final 1/4 six lengths slower than that. A duel with Rachel was only gonna make things worse. Pletcher already had one Malibu Moon filly croak at the distance (at 3/5 in the Alabama), and LAT was likely to do the same. A poor 9/5 shot. I liked Miss Six to get the distance better than LAT, but still thought she was a tad slow, and didn\'t see a lot of value. I did think Rachel was ready to run a big one. I expected a strong 9f, followed by a slow final 1/8, but enough to win. She only needed a :26.5 final 1/4 to win, so I really don\'t regret making the key bet Rachel over Persis. Still, it was Rachel and Calvin, and you knew the combo would be an underlay. Persistently had as good a sheet as you could hope for, and a lovely mile and a quarter stride. And how many times have you seen one of Shug\'s well bred horses not show enough speed to put up a good figure at the middle distances, then pop stretching out? The 2nd dam here was Heavenly Prize, winner of the 10f Alabama over the strip. In the end, I thought it made sense to reverse the exacta with a smaller ticket. Not a huge score by any stretch, but the bet sure made the race fun to watch.
> Did anyone else notice that the win odds on
> Peristently changed (20/1 became 21/1) on the NYRA
> feed long after the trophy presentation? It\'s no
> big deal, and I\'m sure there\'s a technical
> explanation, but events like this certainly don\'t
> inspire confidence in the tote system.