miff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rick,
>
> Don\'t care how many lonshots [Chantal Sutherland] wins
> with,a 4% jockey in Cali.Have seen her blow the turn
> on several occasions in Cali and Canada as her physical
> strength is not in the same area code.She\'s not
> even close to being a top jockey but the most
> beautiful by a pole.
>
> Wanna see a top jockey (female) check out Rosie
> Napravnick
>
> Mike
Miff,
Some food for thought, from recently complete race meetings:
Rosie @ Keeneland: 66 starts, 2 wins, 3% winners, $315,381 in earnings, $4779 earnings per start.
Chantal @ Santa Anita: 147 starts, 16 wins, 11% winners, $1,130,032, $7687 earnings per start.
What does this prove? It *might* mean that you have too high of an opinion of Rosie, and you\'re being too harsh about Chantal\'s riding capabilities.
I find it extremely interesting that Rosie got over 20 mounts per week at Keeneland, while Chantal averaged about 9 per week...so let\'s not have any excuses about how \"tough\" Keeneland is -- Rosie had plenty of chances, every day, while Chantal had to try to not fall asleep waiting for her 2 mounts each day.
We can split hairs about the above comparison all day, but two things came out of it that I believe are beyond refute:
* Chantal Sutherland is NOT a \"4% rider\", as you so breezily dismissed her.
* Rosie N. may very well be a better jock than Chantal one day -- maybe even as good as Julie Krone in the future -- but she got her ass handed to her at Keeneland; clearly, too much, too soon.