I did the analysis for that race and it was a typo. Should have been PR to win at 3-1 or more, which doesn\'t matter anyway since he went off 2-1, and I really didn\'t think he would go off higher. Main thing was the box, since this was basically a 2 horse race when you took into account weight and probable ground loss-- FC had only one race that could be competitive if you thought the other 2 would run their tops (very likely in both cases), there was a good chance FC wasn\'t going to run his top, and even if he did run it he might still run third after giving up a couple of lengths of ground. All in all a very good betting race, especially since we had it looking a lot different than Ragozin-- they actually had the McPeek horse significantly FASTER than SM (!), and PR with a much weaker line (see the comments on the Rag site). Both SM and the Jim Dandy winner came out of the same race, which we had much faster relative to the others than Ragozin did.
All of which makes the Travers a very interesting race. Level weights, Frankel is a big layoff trainer, Tagg is not. Hmmm...