jbelfior Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That\'s a great job by Martin Pedroza on Jeronimo.
> Let\'s break to the lead from the inside and then
> strangle him back to 8th in a race with zero
> pace.
>
> Hey can I just get a fair ride. Third still gets
> me a nice score. Horse is 5 lengths better than
> Stately Victor.
>
> Good Luck,
> Joe B
Pedroza may have given Jeranimo a bad ride but I do not think it is fair to say his mount was 5 lengths better than the 3rd place finisher.
The betting crowd viewed them as roughly equally likely candidates, and, I, for one, thought Stately Victor looked very good going into the race (and certainly better than Jeranimo).
Stately Victor always runs excellent figures on Poly Track. Only Jeranimo\'s two tops on the Santa Anita turf course (2 out of 20 lifetime efforts) are good enough to beat Stately Victor\'s multiple repeated tops on the relevant surface of the day (5 out of 6 lifetime efforts on poly track (and the one not good enough was a very nice two year old top)). To me, Stately Victor clearly looked primed to finally move forward as a 4 yo which made him a top contender (although not quite as good as Acclamation). Jeranimo, on the other hand, is a 5 year old who cannot seem to break through to the top level unless he is running on the Santa Anita turf course (I suspect his Pro Ride numbers are pretty good for that surface, but, notwithstanding how good they are, they still are not as good as Stately Victor\'s usual poly track effort). Pedroza may have done you a disservice (I was not looking at Jeranimo during the running of the race, so I cannot really say) but I do not think it is fair to say his mount was 5 lengths better than the legitimate 3rd place finisher.