Author Topic: Well...  (Read 2246 times)

msola1

  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Re: Sure
« Reply #120 on: December 20, 2011, 04:31:21 PM »
what\'s your point?

clae

  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Sure
« Reply #121 on: December 20, 2011, 04:45:25 PM »
Jerry - thank you for the insight. I\'ve probably been giving to little consideration to 2 y.o. sales prices, and the occasional big jump from yearling-2yo pricing.  Thanks for the response.

Edgorman

  • Posts: 290
    • View Profile
Re: Sure
« Reply #122 on: December 20, 2011, 07:00:37 PM »
If factual, that bet would totally explain both the Double payoff and the inflated win price in the second leg.

Boscar Obarra

  • Posts: 1909
    • View Profile
Re: Sure
« Reply #123 on: December 20, 2011, 07:10:56 PM »
It explains the double , but if anything the win price should have been lower as all the genii spotted the low DD payoff, and rushed to participate in the goodthing.

Rick B.

  • Posts: 1184
    • View Profile
Re: Sure
« Reply #124 on: December 20, 2011, 08:24:57 PM »
Boscar Obarra Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It explains the double , but if anything the win
> price should have been lower as all the genii
> spotted the low DD payoff, and rushed to
> participate in the goodthing.

Normally they would, but my guess is the long layoff and crappy last race at DEL scared most of the \"will pay watchers\" away.

Remember, the average handicapper looking at a cold, dry piece of paper thinks he knows more about a given horse than the trainer, who spends time with the horse most every day, and depends on his training acumen and the horse\'s ability to run so that he can feed his family.