I\'d be interested to hear any thoughts on the way Pletcher has handeled Gemologist and Baffert\'s handling of \'Bode. I\'m not sure what to read if anything into these two colts with very different lead-ups to the derby.
Gemologist will have had just two works since the Wood (and an extra week of rest), and he\'s been sequestered away in Boynton Beach while \'Bode has had two works in the last week, and sharp ones at that.
How do you read these two appraoches? Bode seems much sharper, but it is Pletcher\'s plan to bring Gem in very fresh? Would you say that \'Bode is just doing that well, in which case you\'d like the aggressive training, or does Baffert just do the same thing with every horse regardless? Does he fear \'Bode might be lacking bottom having not raced as a 2 year old, and that\'s why the aggressive training?
Is Pletcher\'s easy training regime a sign of strength? Does he think Gem is so rock solid, he doesn\'t want to take anything out of him, and thus he might explode and run a new top on derby day? Baffert has had of course much more Derby success, so should we put more faith in his plan? If it was anyone other than Pletcher, I\'d be inclined to not like such a training plan bringing a horse into the derby but Pletcher is so good with fresh horses--he\'s kind of like Frankel used to be, take a horse off a layoff and have him run his best, not too many trainers could do that with success.
I\'m not sure how to read these two very different approaches.