richiebee Wrote:
>
> Why NYRA\'s current business model is wrong: I can
> not know this without seeing
> internal records, but would love to see what races
> NYRA is opening for entry
> but not using. Would not be surprised if alot of
> races with \"only\" seven or
> eight quality horses are not being used.
A few different times I went back and looked at what was in the condition book versus what they ran, and they frequently used a big chunk of the substitute races - which are always 20 claimers or maiden claimers, or nyb maiden 20 claimers. It\'s hard to conclude anything other than NYRA seems hell-bent on going with quantity over quality, even at Saratoga.
I am friends with a couple of big players but for the most part, me and the friends I have who play are, as Hyman Roth said of the Risotto Bros., \"small potatoes.\" So maybe we don\'t matter. Maybe it doesn\'t matter that little by little, we\'re dropping out, that I haven\'t played in three weeks, that the guys I used to see up there haven\'t been playing much either. Yeah, for some of us life circumstances play a part, but mostly, it\'s because the product ain\'t what it used to be and in fact, sometimes it flat out stinks, and the stench discourages the sort of excitement we used to feel about the meet. Even without the rain, few if any of the folks in my circle would make the effort to head up there to bother with the embarrassment of a card they puked up yesterday. It\'s not like we lack for other chances during the year to bet on crappy racing.
Once you drift away from a habit or a leisure time activity, after awhile, you kind of get used to living without it, and you don\'t miss it anymore. It\'s like that with golf for me; used to be an addict, got away from it for various reasons, and now, maybe I\'ll play once a year and enjoy it, but I certainly don\'t think about it much anymore. Lately I\'ve been wondering if I\'ll be feeling the same way about this meet and the game in general.