The vast majority don\'t cheat, really? Why does every horse use lasix then? Every thoroughbred bleeds, seriously?
I remember many years back when Charlie Whittingham went from being a 20% winner to about 5% in the span of a few years; suddenly he was surpassed by all these other guys. Charlie got dumb, and they all got smart, all at once, yeah right.
If you took a list of the top ten outfits in the country today, you\'d find numerious violations on almost all of them. Maybe you need to tell yourself they don\'t cheat. If that works for you, fine.
Here\'s your top ten from last year--tell me how many are legit in your mind??? I would say 1 that I could confirm with any confidence doesn\'t cheat. Mott--that\'s it (maybe Casse, I don\'t know him well). Check the violations for everyone else on that list. Eight of of ten of those outfits are \"super trainers\" huge move -up numbers types. C\'mon man, don\'t feed that kid BS and tell him it\'s caviar.
1 Todd A. Pletcher 851 232 129 103 $20,930,980 27% 55%
2 Bob Baffert 534 153 108 69 $14,988,006 29% 62%
3 Steven M. Asmussen 1,346 284 218 208 $13,199,281 21% 53%
4 Dale L. Romans 759 124 100 108 $11,822,394 16% 44%
5 Chad C. Brown 494 138 96 75 $11,060,710 28% 63%
6 William I. Mott 617 101 94 75 $10,879,167 16% 44%
7 Mark E. Casse 675 129 114 101 $10,234,707 19% 51%
8 Doug F. O\'Neill 544 92 91 75 $7,763,762 17% 47%
9 Jerry Hollendorfer 1,047 209 192 171 $7,514,063 20% 55%
10 Richard E. Dutrow, Jr. 512 128 98 71 $7,124,182 25% 58%
Read more on BloodHorse.com:
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/thoroughbred-racing/leaders/leading-trainers/2012#ixzz2QGpPkImH