A couple thoughts.
He didn\'t have some huge jump up today, although it may show that on TG. I think it is a bit complicated. Yes, I am as sure as I can be that TGJB had him too slow going into this race. The fact that 6 other hores were as fast or faster, is just alternate reality.
I say it is complicated, because I am sure the ground loss in may of other horse\'s figures was accurate, but alot of it was inflated. Covered that with General Arod and others prior to the derby. But a horse\'s ability to have multiple gears, leave the gate, get stalking position, press a fast pace and go on can\'t be factored mathematically into a figure. At least nothing on the market right now. Miff called it \"race track fast\" or something like that.
This is a special horse.
I don\'t think he was a good bet at 2-1. The inside draw, the x factor in a 19 horse field, the likelihood of a faster pace than there was, made 2-1 too short to take, and the value in the Oaks Double was horrific, as was the Oaks/Woodford/Derby pick-3.
The funny thing is while the trip was fine, he didn\'t really relax when in behind horses. Samraat had a chance to keep him pinned in and he was pulling a bit. But when he settled after the half, he got a nice trip from there and was long gone.
Last point. While he didn\'t look as good as he was on TG, if you are a Rags user with any common sense, you have to be demanding your money back this weekend. They had the Oaks runner up completely wrong and had California Chrome as a non-contender. At least he was \"one of the ones\" on TG. Not sure how the hell the Rags guys made the figures for Chrome.