Vito,
Guess your issue is the interpretation of pattern reads, or subtle move ups et al vs some of the interpretations here.If you put 10 sheet readers in a room, you could get 5-7 different interpretations looking at the same race.So lack of, or less pairs makes Rags better?
By the way, your comments re TG pairs are pretty much with established turf horses with many races vs lightly raced dirt horses cycling in and out of form.TG does have many pairs but when you look and convert from other figure makers, they are not off the wall.Admit that is not the case with Rags which tend to be far more spread out,so to speak. Strange with the basic methodology of both being very similar.
Next time you see an older turf race on Rags take a look and tell me how many horses run close to a certain figure several times in a row, you might be a little surprised. The nature of turf racing, very slow early, very fast late lends itself to horses running pretty tight figs assuming they fire.Tight range turf figs is something seen on many credible fig makers, including Rags.
Mike
