jbelfior Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Totally agree. This is 1978 all over
> again.......Affirmed, Alydar, Believe It.
>
> Good Luck,
> Joe B
I remember 1978 well and this is the only other crop I have seen that can compare to that (runner up has to be \'87). Even though \'78 was so strong (and there were other good ones that year you are leaving out), I feel that this year is even better than that. My cousin (Joe Hirsch) always insisted to me that \'57 was a magical year and that he felt so lucky to have been able to witness something like that and that it would be another 100 years before a crop like that would come around again (looks to me like he was off by 42 years). I always felt unlucky to have not been around for \'57.......but it looks like my ship is coming in this year.
The sad thing is that here we have potentially the greatest year in horseracing that this sport can offer, and nobody outside us degenerates are noticing. Why aren\'t the sharp madison avenue types pointing out things like it is not possible to see Muhammad Ali-Joe Frazier, or the \'69 Mets, the likes of Bob Gibson, Tom Seaver, Steve Carlton, or, in football, Joe Namath at his peak (yes, prejudiced on this one due to Namath\'s closeness to Hirsch)......but in OUR sport, you can!! To me, just the marvel of the spectacle this year should sell it in droves. If people understood they were being giving a chance to glimpse Olympus, they should come out in droves.
All those journalists that for years were bemoaning another weak crop owe it to report what this crop is truly like. Where is Drape? The NY Times just doesn\'t want to print any good news about horseracing because they are afraid of turning off their moralistic readership (and I say this being part of that readership in all other categories and being a faithfully daily reader)