Author Topic: Oaks  (Read 799 times)

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Oaks
« on: April 26, 2015, 10:33:02 AM »
Guess Mott doesn\'t use sheets. Puca a toss on figs.


\"Mott said he hasn’t delved too deeply into the Oaks but said several handicappers have told him it’s a deep field “without having the standout. The numbers guys say it’s pretty good. If you look at speed figures, our filly(Puca) maybe hasn’t been as good as some of the others, but visually I guess between the Breeders’ Cup and her last race was pretty good. If they get an honest pace it should help her\"
miff

ajkreider

  • Posts: 1063
    • View Profile
Re: Oaks
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2015, 10:48:38 AM »
Was just gonna post on the Oaks.  Talk about a balanced field, there are 10 horses whose best is within 2 points of the group\'s top number.  You\'d think with the chatter around Chatter she be laying over the field.  Not on TG.

mjellish

  • Posts: 901
    • View Profile
Re: Oaks
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2015, 10:52:41 AM »
She will be an underlay and a play against IMO.

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Re: Oaks
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2015, 10:57:18 AM »
Stellar Wind doesn\'t have a great pattern but was wow in last, long sustained wide run.Worked sharp the other day at Santa.

Rudy aiming for Oaks for a long time with CC.
miff

jp702006

  • Posts: 296
    • View Profile
Re: Oaks
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2015, 11:11:22 AM »
My knock against CC is that she seems to get easy uncontested leads. I don\'t think that will happen on Friday.

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: Oaks
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2015, 11:35:36 AM »
Miff-- Was that a serious comment about Rudy? he has been, or the owners?
TGJB

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Re: Oaks
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2015, 11:49:48 AM »
JB,

If you believe what was said,CC has been mildly undertrained,rumored to have issues needing regular maintenance.Looks ok so far since last.CC major player on best.

Mike
miff