Vito,
I start handicapping every race by looking at reasons to toss the favorite, so I can certainly appreciate that you have been the lead \"anti-Orb\" guy on the board, since the Derby ended.
I can certainly agree that new top, paired top, now two weeks rest would seem to be a general recipe for some type of backward move.
All that said, what do you make of the fact that so many Derby winners have run so well over the past 20 years, when they have run back on the 2 weeks rest. I have lost a ton of money betting against Derby winners in the Preakness, including betting against many who didn\'t NEARLY as superior as Orb does, and they still came back to win. (Charismatic, Silver Charm, War Emblem come to mind immediately, the 1st and 3rd because I didn\'t think they were that good, the 2nd because the competition seemed so tough)
The choices in this Preakness just don\'t seem too appealing to me. Do I bet Governor Charlie off the sore foot. Do I bet Itsmyluckyday off a complete dud in the Derby, believing he suddenly couldn\'t handle an off track, despite breeding that suggests otherwise and a nice wet track win. (I believe this horse is now over the top for sure). Do I bet Goldencents off his no-show in the Derby? Another horse bred beautifully for the slop that didn\'t run at all. Do I bet the Lukas runners who have to improve dramatically to win? Oxbow ran courageously, but I would give 2-1 he goes backwards. The other one had the bad trip that everybody saw, and will be an underlay, but I still like him in the Super, but don\'t think he can beat Orb.
I guess my feeling is that I expect Orb to win, can\'t bet him to do so at underlaid odds, but would love to get 6-1 or better on Dreaming of Julia to beat him in the Belmont after Orb squashes the Preakness field.
Jim