Mike,
We all get hung up on works this time of the year, especially Derby week, but even now.
But as Kiaran sort of said, the mile and a half is a completely different animal, more so now than it was 20 years ago, because the breed has changed a lot, with much more \"speed over speed\" pedigrees.
It strikes me that all I really care to know regarding works is whether a horse is doing well or not. At least for this race. The hyperbole really not relevant IMO for the mile and a half.
Part of me says you have to handicap this race different to an EXTREME. let me explain. When I am handicapping a turf race that got washed off the turf course, the turf form is irrelevant to for the most part. A different beat, an off the turf race vs a turf race. This is obvious. But as I was bored yesterday morning and feeling a bit melancholy and watched the replays of the last 20 Belmonts, it strikes me that the mile and a half is ALMOST as different a beast to the other dirt races these horses have previously run, that it needs to be handicapped that way. Sarava, Commendable, Jazil, D\'Tara, and quite a few others.
does the effortless stride and acceleration that AP has matter that much going 1 1/2 miles? The way he blew open the Preakness field in the first quarter mile? Does that really matter in the Belmont? I think it doesn\'t. The Derby is CLOSER to a representation of what the 1 1/2 will look like. And AP ran a pretty good to very good race there, but wasn\'t much better than his competition and HARDLY looked the part of a hose that relished the distance.
The more I watched the replays of previous races and thought through some of the really good horses that crapped out in the Belmont, the more vulnerable I think AP is.
the problem is figuring out who is going to appreciate the extra distance. Sure, Materiality and Frosted are the other logical contenders, and I do like them. but if this REALLY is a different beast (the mile and a half), then you have to think outside the box a bit. What about the Dubai horse? A pure joke that he was 8-1 in the last Derby pool, after his Dubai win. (Did Greenspan coin \"irrational exuberance\"? But, now at 20-1 with the slower type pace he seemed to appreciate in the Dubai race, and his impeccable distance breeding, does a plodder like him have a reasonable shot? I think he does. i already on board with saying that the longest of the Pletchers, as much as I think he is a slug, has a longshot chance here. Seems to be getting better as spring 3 year olds sometimes do. And has that grinding style that suits this race.
I know you have said more than once, \"you don\'t see anybody beating AP if he runs his race\". Fair enough. But why would he run his race? IMO very WEAK distance breeding on the dam side. And a style that seems to be conducive to 1 1/8 type races. Not the grind fest that the Belmont is? That is WITHOUT factoring in the 4th race in 8 weeks, which matters, despite the fact that Baffert seems to be better than most, if not all the trainers at getting his horses to fire in the Triple Crown off short rest.
Rob