Author Topic: My Belmont bet  (Read 1717 times)

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: Stats/Patterns be damned, Science sez
« Reply #30 on: June 04, 2015, 01:18:38 PM »
On the contrary! That\'s as good an explanation of why horses bounce as you will ever see.
TGJB

sekrah

  • Posts: 1802
    • View Profile
Re: My Belmont bet
« Reply #31 on: June 04, 2015, 01:22:19 PM »
AP might not reach .50-1 and Frosted probably won\'t reach 4.30-1 either.  Books have him at +500 and Mat +600. Also, the Belmont has significantly bigger handle than a G1 at Monmouth.

I still don\'t see how it\'s less than $40 for $2.

sekrah

  • Posts: 1802
    • View Profile
Re: Stats/Patterns be damned, Science sez
« Reply #32 on: June 04, 2015, 01:24:17 PM »
Did miff even read that article or was he being sarcastic?

That\'s what most of us figured was behind the patterns all along.

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Re: My Belmont bet
« Reply #33 on: June 04, 2015, 01:25:52 PM »
What are the fair odds prop for the top three betting choices running 1,2,3?
miff

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Re: Stats/Patterns be damned, Science sez
« Reply #34 on: June 04, 2015, 01:30:11 PM »
Sek,

Read this other hypothesis years ago.None identify the individually of each horse, i.e they are NOT all the same in their ability to recover from stress. If you think a number on a piece if paper can identify stress, you are delusional.

Mike
miff

magicnight

  • Posts: 775
    • View Profile
Re: My Belmont bet
« Reply #35 on: June 04, 2015, 01:32:09 PM »
miff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What are the fair odds prop for the top three
> betting choices running 1,2,3?

Where\'s Mathcapper when you need him ... Rocky??

jerry

  • Posts: 1079
    • View Profile
Re: My Belmont bet
« Reply #36 on: June 04, 2015, 01:36:27 PM »
As someone who follows price movement in exactas and doubles, the price action is grotesque. Doesn\'t matter which track. Which do you think is the bigger issue in thoroughbred racing, medication or pool integrity?

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: My Belmont bet
« Reply #37 on: June 04, 2015, 01:38:01 PM »
Manson or Bundy?
TGJB

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Re: My Belmont bet
« Reply #38 on: June 04, 2015, 01:38:42 PM »
We can somewhat gauge drugs, pool integrity no way.
miff

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: Stats/Patterns be damned, Science sez
« Reply #39 on: June 04, 2015, 01:38:44 PM »
If you think that\'s all we\'re doing, you are.
TGJB

jerry

  • Posts: 1079
    • View Profile
Re: Stats/Patterns be damned, Science sez
« Reply #40 on: June 04, 2015, 01:39:25 PM »
Oh yea? How about a -6?

sekrah

  • Posts: 1802
    • View Profile
Re: Stats/Patterns be damned, Science sez
« Reply #41 on: June 04, 2015, 01:45:31 PM »
You don\'t examine the long-term conditioning patterns?  I thought the fact that some horses recover from hard races better than others was pretty standard sheets knowledge.

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Re: Stats/Patterns be damned, Science sez
« Reply #42 on: June 04, 2015, 01:45:56 PM »
JB,

Said stress can not be identified by a number on a piece of paper, that\'s indisputable.

Mike
miff

FrankD.

  • Posts: 1660
    • View Profile
Re: Stats/Patterns be damned, Science sez
« Reply #43 on: June 04, 2015, 01:52:00 PM »
Mike,

Only a slight chance of scattered showers for tomorrow bodes well for SR. Covello on Saturday. Buona Fortuna Jim. A beautiful day on tap for Saturday, if I wasn\'t 56 and grumpy I\'d sell my seats and hang in the backyard all day if I knew I could get cell and WiFi for sure?

I just did my racing form run through of Saturdays card before I mix in the
\"Kool Aide\" outside in the sun with a cocktail and am left in amazement at the opportunities!!!

The rumor mill is churning about the Desormeaux brothers traveling with an extra suit case for tomorrows Tremont?

Good luck,

Frank D.

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: Stats/Patterns be damned, Science sez
« Reply #44 on: June 04, 2015, 01:53:40 PM »
On a percentage basis, in context, it can, and that\'s indisputable. See \"Thoro-Patterns\" for proof. But aside from that, all the things that affect this question are what we discuss in ROTW and handicapping-- how big the top is, time since, how the horse has reacted to previous tops. You are framing the question as a straw man-- we\'re not seeing an amount of stress in one number.

By the way, if the only way to make decisions was if you had first hand physical knowledge of the individual horse, it would be awful tough to bet horses. You would have to know not only about that one, but all the ones he\'s running against, too.

Likewise all other bets and investment decisions...
TGJB